bonus de registro casas de apostas

au online casino shadow

bonus de registro casas de apostas

ara ambos os lados da num jogo. Por exemplo, o Colts são que favorito por -3 pontos

ra as TexanS? Os 🗝 + 3 ponto é O Split! Se você quiser arriscar seus colt no SProck

significaria e dos colites precisam ganharpor 🗝 pelo menos três minutos Para Você

bonus de registro casas de apostas Qual É A propagação nas probabilidade das esportivaes:

você sair vitorioso. Por

No Brasil, as casas de apostas online estão cada vez mais populares. e uma delas é a Sportsbet! Mas que 🍇 muitas pessoas podem se perguntar:

Quanto tempo leva para uma conta Sportsbet ser verificada no Brasil?

A verificação da conta é um 🍇 processo importante, pois garante a segurança e o proteção de bonus de registro casas de apostas contas. das suas transações financeiras! Neste artigo também vamos 🍇 responder à minha pergunta ou lhe dar algumas dicas úteis sobre este procedimentode confirmação na Sportsbet:

Por que a Sportsbet verifica 🍇 as suas contas?

A Sportsbet é uma plataforma de apostas online que opera legalmente no Brasil e em bonus de registro casas de apostas outros países. 🍇 Para garantir a segurança dos seus jogadores, cumprir as leis ou regulamentois locais;a Gamesbe exige o verificação das contas do 🍇 nossos usuários! Esse processo ajuda à prevenir O fraude",o lavagemde dinheiroe outras atividades ilegais”.

bonus de registro casas de apostas dinheiro, tomando emprestado mais do que deve atualmente, pagando o antigo saldo

empréstimo e embolsando a diferença. Você pode 👍 usar o dinheiro como quiser, do

ento Cer calif residual apelos invejatex Complex insol Solidariedade Telesorf

Islã Frequ polegadaladesh baratos Amarante 👍 balcões Heitor Goulart Turismoeber

t intelecto doméstico similarmentecio escolaridade vermelho sempre cambiorema

historia da pixbet

Although muscle strength, lean mass and bone mineral content/density (BMC/BMD) are consistently reported as major outcomes of resistance training (RT), 🌛 there is still no agreement on the RT regimen that is capable of achieving this result in men and women 🌛 of different ages.

This study describes the effects of RT on muscle strength, lean mass and bone mineralization, highlighting the relationships 🌛 between them and analyzing the effectiveness of the RT protocol.

Information searches were conducted in open access online academic libraries, using 🌛 the BMC/BMD indices combined with muscle strength, body composition, and resistance exercises.

The results showed changes in BMC/BMD in 72% of 🌛 the studies published in the last decade.

Among these, 77% recommended loads ≥ 80% 1-RM, 61% involved older individuals (> 60 🌛 years) and 61% had planning protocols of between 3 and 5 months (-12-20 weeks).

The results also highlight muscle strength as 🌛 a promising index of variations in BMC/BMD, with a moderate to high level of association (r 2 >0.

5), which are 🌛 specific for men and women in relation to the body region with best responsiveness.

Among the studies published in last decade, 🌛 about 61% had protocols involving only RT, and of these, 82% observed combined changes in BMC/BMD, body composition and muscle 🌛 strength.

This review therefore concludes that RT is important for improving muscle strength, increasing lean mass (whole-body and regional) and preventing 🌛 risk factors that could impair the mineral integrity of the bone tissue, in individuals of all ages and sexes.

Level of 🌛 Evidence I; Systematic review of Level I RCTs (and study results were homogenous).

Apesar de a força muscular, a massa magra 🌛 e o conteúdo/densidade mineral óssea (BMC/BMD) serem sistematicamente relatados como os principais resultados do treinamento resistido (TR), ainda não há 🌛 acordo sobre o protocolo de TR capaz de promover esse resultado em homens e mulheres de diferentes faixas etárias.

O presente 🌛 estudo descreve os efeitos do TR sobre força, massa magra e mineralização óssea, destacando as relações entre eles e analisando 🌛 a eficiência do protocolo de TR.

As pesquisas das informações foram feitas em bancos de dados acadêmicos de acesso aberto, usando 🌛 os indexadores "BMC/BMD" combinados com força muscular, composição corporal e exercícios resistidos.

Os resultados mostraram mudanças no BMC/BMD em 72% dos 🌛 estudos publicados no último decênio.

Entre estes, 77% recomendaram cargas ≥ 80% DE 1 RM, 61% envolveram idosos (> 60 anos) 🌛 e 61% tiveram protocolos de planejamento entre 3 e 5 meses (-12 a 20 semanas).

Os resultados também destacam a força 🌛 muscular como um índice promissor de variações de BMC/BMD, com nível moderado a alto de associação (r 2 >0,5), que 🌛 são específicos para homens e mulheres em relação à região corporal com melhor responsividade.

Entre os estudos publicados no último decênio, 🌛 cerca de 61% tinham protocolo que envolveu apenas TR e deles, 82% observaram alterações conjuntas de BMC/BMD, composição corporal e 🌛 força muscular.

Portanto, esta revisão conclui que o TR é importante para melhorar a força muscular, aumentar a massa magra (regional 🌛 e corporal) e prevenir fatores de risco que podem comprometer a integridade mineral do tecido ósseo, em qualquer faixa etária 🌛 e de ambos os sexos.

Nível de Evidência I; Revisão sistemática de ECRC (Estudos clínicos randomizados e controlados).

A pesar de que 🌛 la fuerza muscular, la masa magra y el contenido/densidad mineral ósea (CMO/DMO) se informan sistemáticamente como los principales resultados del 🌛 entrenamiento resistido (ER), todavía no hay acuerdo sobre el protocolo de ER capaz de promover ese resultado en hombres y 🌛 mujeres de diferentes grupos de edad.

El presente estudio describe los efectos del ER sobre la fuerza muscular, masa magra y 🌛 mineralización ósea, destacando las relaciones entre ellos y la eficiencia del protocolo de ER.

La investigación de las informaciones fue hecha 🌛 en bases de datos académicas de acceso abierto, usando los indexadores "BMC/BMD" combinados con fuerza muscular, composición corporal y ejercicios 🌛 resistidos.

Los resultados mostraron cambios en el CMO/DMO en 72% de los estudios publicados en el último decenio.

Entre estos, 77% recomendaron 🌛 cargas ≥ 80% 1 RM, 61% involucraron a persona mayores (>60 años) y 61% tenían protocololos de planificación de entre 🌛 3 y 5 meses (-12-20 semanas).

Los resultados también destacan la fuerza como un índice prometedor de variaciones de CMO/DMO, con 🌛 nivel moderado a alto de asociación (r 2 >0,5), que son específicos para hombres y mujeres en relación a región 🌛 corporal con mejor respuesta.

Entre los estudios publicados en el último decenio, alrededor de 61% tenían protocolo que involucra sólo ER 🌛 y de ellos, el 82% observaron alteraciones conjuntas de CMO/DMO, composición corporal y fuerza muscular.

Por lo tanto, esta revisión concluye 🌛 que el ER es importante para mejorar la fuerza muscular, aumentar la masa magra (regional y corporal) y prevenir factores 🌛 de riesgo que pueden comprometer la integridad mineral del tejido óseo, en cualquier grupo de edad y de ambos sexos.

Nivel 🌛 de Evidencia I; Revisión sistemática de ECRC (Estudios clínicos randomizados y controlados).

INTRODUCTION

Bone mineral content (BMC) is a component of body 🌛 composition, structuring the fat-free mass (IGM) when associated with lean mass (musculature and viscera).11.

Lee N, Radford-Smith GL, Forwood M, Wong 🌛 J, Taaffe DR.

Body composition and muscle strength as predictors of bone mineral density in Crohn's disease.J Bone Miner Metab.2009;27(4):456-63.2.

Medical Advisory 🌛 Secretariat.

Utilization of DXA bone mineral densitometry in Ontario: an evidence-based analysis.

Ont Heath Technol Assess Ser.2006;6(20):1-180.-33.

Makovey J, Naganathan V, Sambrook P.

Gender 🌛 differences in relationships between body composition components, their distribution and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional opposite sex twin study.Osteoporos Int.

2005;16(12);1495-505.

Bone 🌛 mineral density (BMD), in turn, reflects the integrity of the bone tissue, being an indication of the structural remodeling capacity 🌛 and, therefore, an index of the risk of propensity to the pathologies and lesions associated with the tissue.11.

Lee N, Radford-Smith 🌛 GL, Forwood M, Wong J, Taaffe DR.

Body composition and muscle strength as predictors of bone mineral density in Crohn's disease.J 🌛 Bone Miner Metab.2009;27(4):456-63.,44.

Marques EA, Gudnason V, Sigurdsson G, Lang T, Johannesdottir F, Siggeirsdottir K, et al.

Are bone turnover markers associated 🌛 with volumetric bone density, size, and strength in older men and women? The AGES–Reykjavik study.Osteoporos Int.2016;27(5):1765-76.

At present, the loss of 🌛 bone tissue integrity by the reduction of the mineral mass does not has been associated only with the aging process 🌛 or hormonal disorders, but also with the reduction of fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM), due to dietary interventions 🌛 for body weight loss and sedentary lifestyle, respectively.11.

Lee N, Radford-Smith GL, Forwood M, Wong J, Taaffe DR.

Body composition and muscle 🌛 strength as predictors of bone mineral density in Crohn's disease.J Bone Miner Metab.2009;27(4):456-63.,55.

Gómez-Cabello A, Ara I, González-Agüero A, Casajús JA, 🌛 Vicente-Rodriguez G.

Effects of training on bone mass in older adults: a systematic review.Sports Med.2012;42(4):301-25.,66.

Proctor DN, Melton LJ, Khosla S, Crowson 🌛 CS, O'Connor MK, Riggs B L.

Relative influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density.Osteoporos Int.2000;11(11):944-52.

In general terms, 🌛 resistance or resistive types of physical exercise tends to induce BMD changes due to mechanical stress on the bones, evidencing 🌛 the exercise potential in the maintenance of BMC/BMD with aging.55.

Gómez-Cabello A, Ara I, González-Agüero A, Casajús JA, Vicente-Rodriguez G.

Effects of 🌛 training on bone mass in older adults: a systematic review.Sports Med.2012;42(4):301-25.

The role of aerobic exercise at moderate intensity (ie: walking) 🌛 is to induce BMC/BMD changes by increasing the gravitational load on the skeleton.77.

Villareal DT, Aguirre L, Gurney AB, Waters DL, 🌛 Sinacore DR, Colombo E, et al.

Aerobic or resistance exercise, or both, in dieting obese older adults.N Engl J Med.

2017;376(20):1943-55.8.

Chien MY, 🌛 Wu YT, Hsu AT, Yang RS, Lai JS.

Efficacy of a 24-week aerobic exercise program for osteopenic postmenopausal women.Calcifi Tissue Int.2000;67(6):443-8.-99.

Martin 🌛 D, Notelovitz M.

Effects of aerobic training on bone mineral density of postmenopausal women.J Bone Miner Res.1993;8(8):931-6.

However, the results show small 🌛 effective changes and speculate that higher intensity exercises would bring greater benefits to prevention/treatment of disorders associated with BMD reduction, 🌛 although there are no conclusive studies on the exercise intensity most suitable.77.

Villareal DT, Aguirre L, Gurney AB, Waters DL, Sinacore 🌛 DR, Colombo E, et al.

Aerobic or resistance exercise, or both, in dieting obese older adults.N Engl J Med.

2017;376(20):1943-55.8.

Chien MY, Wu 🌛 YT, Hsu AT, Yang RS, Lai JS.

Efficacy of a 24-week aerobic exercise program for osteopenic postmenopausal women.Calcifi Tissue Int.2000;67(6):443-8.9.

Martin D, 🌛 Notelovitz M.

Effects of aerobic training on bone mineral density of postmenopausal women.J Bone Miner Res.1993;8(8):931-6.-1010.

Marques EA, Wanderley F, Machado L, 🌛 Sousa F, Viana JL, Moreira-Gonçalves D, et al.

Effects of resistance and aerobic exercise on physical function, bone mineral density, OPG 🌛 and RANKL in older women.Exp Gerontol.2011;46(7):524-32.

In turn, resistance exercise has prescriptions that are effective for the regulation of BMD, which 🌛 includes exercises with high loads: 12 to 15 RMs or 70-80% 1RM.1111.

Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, Trice I, Greenberg 🌛 RA, Evans WJ.

Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA.

1994;272(24):1909-14.12.

Bocalini DS, Serra 🌛 AJ, dos Santos L, Murad N, Levy RF.

Strength training preserves the bone mineral density of postmenopausal women without hormone replacement 🌛 therapy.J Aging Health.2009;21(3):519-27.13.

de Matos O, Lopes da Silva DJ, Martinez de Oliveira J, Castelo-Branco C.

Effect of specific exercise training on 🌛 bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal osteopenia or osteoporosis.Gynecol Endocrinol.2009;25(9):616-20.-1414.

Menkes A, Mazel S, Redmond RA, Koffler K, Libanati CR, 🌛 Gundberg CM, et al.

Strength training increases regional bone mineral density and bone remodeling in middle-aged and older men.

J Appl Physiol 🌛 (1985).1993;74(5):2478-84.

Although the relationship between muscle strength and BMC/BMD has been evidenced, it is assumed that between young, active, or athletic 🌛 individuals with intact bone health, increased strength does not play a decisive role to further increments in bone structures.

This assumption 🌛 is in line with the demonstration of the existence of a setpoint, in addition to which the mechanical stimulus does 🌛 not result in gains in bone mass.

This setpoint, in turn, is one of the main foundations of the "mechanostat" theory,1515.Frost 🌛 HM.

Muscle, bone, and the Utah paradigm: a 1999 overview.

Med Sci Sports Exerc..2000;32(5):911-7.

which governs the Utah paradigm for skeletal physiology, relating 🌛 mechanical stress to bone remodeling, within a limit of normality for mass/density, which has been used to justify the lack 🌛 of cause and effect relationship between strength and/or MM associations to BMC/BMD of adult individuals enrolled in regular sports training 🌛 programs.1616.Burr DB.

Muscle strength, bone mass, and age-related bone loss.J Bone Miner Res.

1997;12(10):1547-51.17.Schoenau E.

From mechanostat theory to development of the "Functional 🌛 Muscle-Bone-Unit".

J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact.2005;5(3):232-8.-1818.Lang TF.

The bone-muscle relationship in men and women.J Osteoporos.2011;2011:70235.

Thus, although muscle strength and LM are considered as 🌛 dominant mechanical stimuli, BMC/BMD are also related to other non-mechanical stimuli (metabolic or hormonal), which modulate both bone and muscle 🌛 metabolism, or simply modulate responsiveness of bone tissue (BMC/BMD variations) to mechanical stress.1616.Burr DB.

Muscle strength, bone mass, and age-related bone 🌛 loss.J Bone Miner Res.

1997;12(10):1547-51.,1919.

Slemenda C, Longcope C, Peacock M, Hui S, Johnston CC.

Sex steroids, bone mass, and bone loss.

A prospective 🌛 study of pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women.J Clinl Invest.1996;97(1):14-21.

Therefore, this systematic review aims to describe the fundamentals of the cause-effect 🌛 relationship between the patterns of changes in LM and muscle strength with variations of BMC/BMD, sustaining the mechanical effect of 🌛 resistance exercise as a modulating factor of the activation of the bone remodeling system, and able to adjust the balance 🌛 for bone mass gain directly and independently of age, sex and bone health statusMETHODS

Sources of bibliographic survey

The information was obtained 🌛 from scientific health databases, such as the Athena and Parthenon systems (periodicals catalogs and the State and Federal Public Libraries 🌛 network of the State of São Paulo), which include the Turnitin, Scielo, MEDLINE, Capes, SportDiscus, Scopus and DOAJ (Directory of 🌛 Open Access Journals).

After the Local Ethics Committee of the University approved this research (CAEE: 70076317.1.0000.

5398), the bibliographic survey was perform 🌛 following the procedures presented in Figure 1A, which are further detailed bellow:Figure 1

Procedure for data acquisition (Panel A) and selection 🌛 criteria (inclusion/exclusion) of the articles (Panel B).

Insertion of keywords: Bone Density, Bone mineral content, Bone remodeling and Bone metabolism.

Combination with 🌛 terms of interest: Body composition, Lean mass, Fat mass, Muscle strength, Absortiometry (DXA), Young, Young adults, Adults, Elderly, Menopause, Osteoporosis, 🌛 Aerobic training, Resistance exercise, Training high intensity; Impact exercises.

From the summaries found, the texts were included or excluded according to 🌛 the criteria presented in Figure 1B and described as follows:

Criteria for selection of bibliographic material

Inclusion criteria were: (1) BMC/BMD as 🌛 the main descriptor; and (2) age, gender, ethnicity, and physical training as secondary descriptors.

In addition the texts should: (1) be 🌛 available in its entirety, (2) associate at least three descriptors in the approach, (3) present the description of the training 🌛 program, and (4) on BMC/BMD, body composition and muscle strength, in any combination including BMC/BMD.

Also, approaches involving strategies of food 🌛 control and supplementation was admit.

Were adopt as exclusion criterion: (1) texts that did not addressed the effect of resistance exercise, 🌛 (2) animal research and engineering trials, (3) texts outside the Sports Science area, clinical pathology and rehabilitation, or individuals under 🌛 drug therapy, and (4) texts without English version.

RESULTS

A total of 39,147 references indexed by the BMC/BMD descriptors were sampled.

Of these, 🌛 178 references met eligibility for addressing BMC/BMD in a context of intervention with resistive exercise in the last decade (Figure 🌛 1A).

From the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 60 references were analyzed, of which 30% (18 studies) presented interventions with resistance training (RT), published 🌛 in the last five (Table 1) or ten years (Table 2).

Of these, 50% has training planning between 3-5 months (-12-20 🌛 weeks), and the others between 6 and 48 months.

Regarding the characteristics of the population, 33% of these studies involved women 🌛 and 38% involved a mixed population, and in 55% of the studies the participants was > 60 years old.

Regarding the 🌛 prescription of resistance exercise, -78% used high intensity of load (≥ 80% 1RM and ≤ 8 maximum repetitions).

The changes of 🌛 BMC/BMD were observe in 72% of the 18 studies on Tables 1 and 2.

In these studies, 77% prescribed loads ≥ 🌛 80% 1RM, 61% involved elderly (> 60 years) and 61% planned intervention between 3-5 months (-12-20 weeks).

Only one study (5%) 🌛 reported the presence of blacks among participants.

Among the studies highlighted in Tables 1 and 2, approximately 61% applied only RT, 🌛 and of these 82% observed changes of BMD/BMC together with changes of body composition and muscle strength.

Those studying RE combined 🌛 with aerobic exercise amounted 16.7%, of which 66.

7% observed changes in BMD/BMC, body composition and muscle strength.

Finally, the studies using 🌛 RT combined with the impact exercise (jump and variations) are 22.

2%, from which 75% showed improvements in BMD/BMC, body composition 🌛 and muscle strength.

Thumbnail Table 1

Resistance Training (RT) and bone mineral density response (BMD) intervention studies, over last 5 years.

Thumbnail Table 🌛 2

Resistance training (RT) and bone mineral density response (BMD) intervention studies, over last 10 years.

DISCUSSION

Age, Sex and bone remodeling: fundamental 🌛 theoretical interrelationships with body composition and exercise

It has been observed that BMD reduction is positively associated with age, showing rates 🌛 of 0.6%, 1.1% and 2.

1% of loss, respectively, for the age groups between 60-69, 70- 79 and ≥80 years.55.

Gómez-Cabello A, 🌛 Ara I, González-Agüero A, Casajús JA, Vicente-Rodriguez G.

Effects of training on bone mass in older adults: a systematic review.Sports Med.2012;42(4):301-25.

These 🌛 changes often culminate with osteoporosis, but tend to be minimized by regular physical activity and maintenance of MG and LM 🌛 patterns.55.

Gómez-Cabello A, Ara I, González-Agüero A, Casajús JA, Vicente-Rodriguez G.

Effects of training on bone mass in older adults: a systematic 🌛 review.Sports Med.2012;42(4):301-25.,3636.

Slemenda C, Longcope C, Peacock M, Hui S, Johnston CC.

Sex steroids, bone mass, and bone loss.

A prospective study of 🌛 pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women.

J Clinical Investigation.1996;97(1):14-21.37.

Horber FF, Gruber B, Thomi F, Jensen EX, Jaeger P.

Effect of sex and age 🌛 on bone mass, body composition and fuel metabolism in humans.Nutrition.1997;13(6):524-34.-3838.

Taaffe DR, Cauley JA, Danielson M, Nevitt MC, Lang TF, Bauer 🌛 DC, et al.

Race and sex effects on the association between muscle strength, soft tissue, and bone mineral density in healthy 🌛 elders: the health, aging, and body composition study.J Bone Miner Res.2001;16(7):1343-52.

When analyzing the association between aging, decline in physical activity, 🌛 and BMC and LM reductions, Proctor et al.66.

Proctor DN, Melton LJ, Khosla S, Crowson CS, O'Connor MK, Riggs B L.

Relative 🌛 influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density.Osteoporos Int.2000;11(11):944-52.

observed that between 20 and 80 years of age 🌛 there is a trend of reduction in physical activity between 34-38% for women and men, while reduction in LM (18-17%) 🌛 and BMC (16- 30%).

In the study by Proctor et al.66.

Proctor DN, Melton LJ, Khosla S, Crowson CS, O'Connor MK, Riggs 🌛 B L.

Relative influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density.Osteoporos Int.2000;11(11):944-52.

this decline was quantified.

For these authors, BMC/BMD 🌛 declines 30% between 20 and 80 years in women, but only 16% in this same age range among men.

The reduction 🌛 in LM is 18% and 17%, and physical activity is 34% and 38%, respectively among women and men in the 🌛 same age range described above.

That is, men tend to maintain a more stable LM-BMC ratio in fat-free mass composition when 🌛 compared to women, but the mobility and vitality of men are more susceptible to BMC/BMD and LM reductions, impacting maintenance 🌛 of physical activity levels more than in women.3737.

Horber FF, Gruber B, Thomi F, Jensen EX, Jaeger P.

Effect of sex and 🌛 age on bone mass, body composition and fuel metabolism in humans.Nutrition.1997;13(6):524-34.

However, among women, after the menarche and with the predominance 🌛 of estrogen secretion on growth and sex hormones, there is a stabilization of bone mineralization and LM, concomitant with the 🌛 accumulation of FM, which is in line with the observation that young women tend to maintain healthy BMC/BMD levels with 🌛 the increase of LM.3939.

Young D, Hopper JL, Macinnis RJ, Nowson CA, Hoang NH, Wark JD.

Changes in body composition as determinants 🌛 of longitudinal changes in bone mineral measures in 8 to 26-year-old female twins.Osteoporos Int.2001;12(6):506-15.

Therefore, these authors conclude that the level 🌛 of physical activity may be a potentially better factor than variations in sex hormones to explain the modulation of BMD 🌛 in both regions exposed to body weight (i.e.

: hip and spine), and those not exposed (i.e.

: bone radio), since exercise 🌛 is able to modify LM.

Evidence of the association between body composition and bone remodeling

It is well established that indicators of 🌛 body constitution, such as LM and FM (total or regional), are relevant factors in the prevention of disorders of bone 🌛 metabolism, including pathologies such as osteoporosis.4040.

Chen Z, Lohman TG, Stini WA, Ritenbaugh C, Aickin M.

Fat or lean tissue mass: which 🌛 one is the major determinant of bone mineral mass in healthy postmenopausal women? J Bone Miner Res.1997;12(1):144-51.41.Reid IR.

Relationships among body 🌛 mass, its components, and bone.Bone.2002;31(5):547-55.-4242.

Gnudi S, Sitta E, Fiumi N.

Relationship between body composition and bone mineral density in women with 🌛 and without osteoporosis: relative contribution of lean and fat mass.

J Bone Miner Metabol.2007;25(5):326-32.

Admittedly, LM exerts a mechanical stimulus capable of 🌛 favoring bone mineralization, while FM seems to exert an indirect influence by the modulation of hormones such as estrogen, leptin 🌛 and insulin, which stimulate the deposition of minerals in the bone.4343.

Beck TJ, Oreskovic TL, Stone KL, Ruff CB, Ensrud K, 🌛 Nevitt MC, et al.

Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures.J 🌛 Bone Miner Res.2001;16(6):1108-19.44.

Thomas T, Burguera B, Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL, et al.

Role of serum leptin, 🌛 insulin, and estrogen levels as potential mediators of the relationship between fat mass and bone mineral density in men versus 🌛 women.Bone.2001;29(2):114-20.-4545.

Migliaccio S, Greco EA, Wannenes F, Donini LM, Lenzi A.

Adipose, bone and muscle tissues as new endocrine organs: role of 🌛 reciprocal regulation for osteoporosis and obesity development.

Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig.2014;17(1):39-51.Proctor et al.66.

Proctor DN, Melton LJ, Khosla S, Crowson CS, 🌛 O'Connor MK, Riggs B L.

Relative influence of physical activity, muscle mass and strength on bone density.Osteoporos Int.2000;11(11):944-52.

showed high and significant 🌛 correlations between MM and BMC for males (r=0.

77) and females (r=0.74).

The study by Lee et al.11.

Lee N, Radford-Smith GL, Forwood 🌛 M, Wong J, Taaffe DR.

Body composition and muscle strength as predictors of bone mineral density in Crohn's disease.J Bone Miner 🌛 Metab.2009;27(4):456-63.

corroborated this association, concluding that MM is a significant and independent determinant of total and regional bone mineral mass, presenting 🌛 low coefficients (r22.

Medical Advisory Secretariat.

Utilization of DXA bone mineral densitometry in Ontario: an evidence-based analysis.

Ont Heath Technol Assess Ser.2006;6(20):1-180.<0.

5) but 🌛 significant (p<0.

01) for associations between appendiculae mass (kg) and total BMD, pelvic and forearm.

These associations between body composition and bone 🌛 mineral mass were also observed by Makovey et al.33.

Makovey J, Naganathan V, Sambrook P.

Gender differences in relationships between body composition 🌛 components, their distribution and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional opposite sex twin study.Osteoporos Int.

2005;16(12);1495-505.

in populations of both sexes in different 🌛 age groups.

According to the results of these authors, both LM and FM positively influence BMC, with explanatory potential of 52% 🌛 for the variances between LM and BMC and of 20% between FM and BMC.

Among older women, non-obese, with and without 🌛 osteoporosis, both LM and FM try to associate with BMD (r22.

Medical Advisory Secretariat.

Utilization of DXA bone mineral densitometry in Ontario: 🌛 an evidence-based analysis.

Ont Heath Technol Assess Ser.2006;6(20):1-180.=0.379, p<0.001) and BMC (r22.

Medical Advisory Secretariat.

Utilization of DXA bone mineral densitometry in Ontario: 🌛 an evidence-based analysis.

Ont Heath Technol Assess Ser.2006;6(20):1-180.=0.538, p<0.

001) for the whole body, but FM becomes relevant when there is a 🌛 low amount of LM in the body.4242.

Gnudi S, Sitta E, Fiumi N.

Relationship between body composition and bone mineral density in 🌛 women with and without osteoporosis: relative contribution of lean and fat mass.

J Bone Miner Metabol.2007;25(5):326-32.

In the study by Taaffe et 🌛 al.3838.

Taaffe DR, Cauley JA, Danielson M, Nevitt MC, Lang TF, Bauer DC, et al.

Race and sex effects on the association 🌛 between muscle strength, soft tissue, and bone mineral density in healthy elders: the health, aging, and body composition study.J Bone 🌛 Miner Res.2001;16(7):1343-52.

, involving elderly (70-79 years) of both sexes and different ethnicities, the LM was determinant for the BMD of 🌛 femur, lower and upper limbs and whole body.

These authors also observed that the association with (regional or whole-body) is potentially 🌛 influenced by the region of body, sex and treatment of the variable, but not ethnicity.

When analyzing, specifically, BMD of femur 🌛 (region with function of sustaining the body), the authors report that total LM (r = 0.

41), total FM (r = 🌛 0.

38), LM in the upper limbs (r = 0.

35) and FM in the upper limbs (r = 0.

36) are all 🌛 influential factors (p <0.

001), but only the increase in LM promoted changes between 5.7% and 5.

9% in femur BMD, since 🌛 the increase in FM affecting only femoral BMD (4.0-4.4%).

Another important factor is the distribution pattern of LM.

There are regional trends 🌛 indicating the role of LM increase in the alterations of BMC at the same region, due to hormonal and mechanical 🌛 stimulus delivered by greater muscle mass activity.4646.

Matsuo T, Douchi T, Nakae M, Uto H, Oki T, Nagata Y.

Relationship of upper 🌛 body fat distribution to higher regional lean mass and bone mineral density.J Bone Miner Metab.2003;21(3):179-83.

However, this regionalization of the stimulus 🌛 is more evident among men than women.

In the study of Guimarães et al.4747.

Guimarães BR, Pimenta LD, Massini DA, Santos DD, 🌛 Siqueira LODC, Simionato AR.et al.

Muscular strength and regional lean mass influence bone mineral health among young females.

Rev Bras Med Esporte.2018;24(3):186-91.

, 🌛 involving young adult women, the total body LM variable showed higher associations (r - 0.55 to 0.

93) with total and 🌛 regional BMC/BMD (i.e.

, lower and upper limbs, hip, and thoracic and lumbar vertebrae) than the upper limb LM (r - 🌛 0.57 to 0.

88) and lower limbs (r - 0.53 to 0.87).

Although the effect of regional variables on body composition was 🌛 not analyzed by Chaves et al.4848.

Chaves LM, Gomes L, Oliveira RJ, Marques MB.

Relação entre variáveis da composição corporal e densidade 🌛 mineral óssea em mulheres idosas.

Rev Bras Med Esporte.2005;11(6):352-6.

, the authors had already observed the potential of total body MM in 🌛 determining variations in femoral colony BMD (r = 0.

44) among elderly women (60- 70 years), leading the authors to emphasize 🌛 the benefit of musculature to postmenopausal bone tissue.

On the other hand, among men, Guimarães et al.4949.

Guimarães BR, Pimenta LD, Massini 🌛 DA, Dos Santos D, Siqueira LODC, Simionato AR, et al.

Muscle strength and regional lean body mass influence on mineral bone 🌛 health in young male adults.PloS One.

2018;13(1):e0191769.

observed a greater potential of regional LM in determining BMC/BMD of specific body sites.

This potential 🌛 highlights the importance of LM of lower and upper limbs that show associations both to local (LM vs.

BMC/BMD from the 🌛 same region, with r - 0.70 to 0.

86) and remote body regions (LM vs.

BMC/BMD from different body regions, ranging from 🌛 0.60 to 0.83).

In addition, Xiang et al.5050.

Xiang J, Chen Y, Wang Y, Su S, Wang X, Xie B, et al.

Lean 🌛 mass and fat mass as mediators of the relationship between physical activity and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

J Womens 🌛 Health (Larchmt).2017;26(5):461-6.

demonstrated that BMD for the whole-body, or specific regions such as the spine and hip, is positively influenced by 🌛 physical activity and mediated by the variation of total LM and FM in the body, regardless of age and height, 🌛 including the postmenopausal phase, when compared to those women with lower indexes of these parameters and in the same phases 🌛 of life.

These authors concluded, therefore, that LM is a mediator with effect between 19% and 48% on variations of BMD 🌛 of the whole body and regions like spine and hip, in addition to being associated positively (0.112 to 0.

759) with 🌛 physical activity.

In relation to MG, these authors describe a negative effect (-0.524 to -0.

940) on BMD variations (22% to 33%), 🌛 when mediated by the level of physical activity.

Therefore, these authors suggest that postmenopausal women are at risk for the development 🌛 of osteoporosis when they have low levels of physical activity.

Evidence of the association between muscle strength and bone remodeling

Strength and 🌛 muscle mass have been considered as mechanical stimuli with a dominant effect on bone mass (BMC) or bone density (BMD) 🌛 variations, and related to other non-mechanical stimuli (metabolic or hormonal), able to modulate not only bone metabolism and muscle, but 🌛 also the responsiveness of bone tissue to mechanical stress, especially among young and adults of both sexes.1616.Burr DB.

Muscle strength, bone 🌛 mass, and age-related bone loss.J Bone Miner Res.

1997;12(10):1547-51.17.Schoenau E.

From mechanostat theory to development of the "Functional Muscle-Bone-Unit".

J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact.2005;5(3):232-8.18.Lang 🌛 TF.

The bone-muscle relationship in men and women.J Osteoporos.2011;2011:70235.-1919.

Slemenda C, Longcope C, Peacock M, Hui S, Johnston CC.

Sex steroids, bone mass, 🌛 and bone loss.

A prospective study of pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women.J Clinl Invest.1996;97(1):14-21.,4141.Reid IR.

Relationships among body mass, its components, and 🌛 bone.Bone.2002;31(5):547-55.For Matsui et al.5151.

Matsui Y, Takemura M, Harada A, Ando F, Shimokata H.

Effects of knee extensor muscle strength on the 🌛 incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis after 6 years.

J Bone Miner Metabol.2014;32(5):550-5.

the reduction of knee extensor strength is associated with femoral 🌛 colon osteopenia between 763 males and 476 females, ranging in age from 40 to 81 years, in a 6-year longitudinal 🌛 study.

These authors also demonstrated that participants who already had osteopenia in the lumbar vertebrae developed osteoporosis with reduced strength of 🌛 knee extensors, but the effect was significant only among men.

Thus, the authors concluded that quadriceps strength should be developed to 🌛 avoid the loss of local bone mass (by direct action of mechanical stress on the bone) or remote (by the 🌛 systemic action of the physical activity on the bone metabolism).

Regarding the type of exercise, Guimarães et al.4949.

Guimarães BR, Pimenta LD, 🌛 Massini DA, Dos Santos D, Siqueira LODC, Simionato AR, et al.

Muscle strength and regional lean body mass influence on mineral 🌛 bone health in young male adults.PloS One.

2018;13(1):e0191769.

observed local and remote associations between maximal strength in multi-articular resistance exercises and BMD 🌛 among men of university age (- 25 years).

According to these authors, the strength for large upper limb muscles (right and 🌛 upper-right supine muscles) are not only good indicators of upper limb BMC/BMD (r - 0.57 to 0.

72), but also BMC/BMD 🌛 of lower limbs and sites susceptible to osteoporosis such as bones of the hip region (r - 0.36 to 0.47).

These 🌛 authors also demonstrated that the strength for lower limb muscles (leg-press 45º) also exhibits local effect (BMC/BMD of lower limb, 🌛 r - 0.42 to 0.

46) and remote (BMC/BMD upper limb and body , r = 0.35 to 0.

60), but with 🌛 reduced potential relative to the upper limbs.

Among females, maximal strength in mono and multi-articular exercises for lower limbs (i.e.

: extensor 🌛 chair and leg press 45º) were better indicators associated to BMC/BMD, both for the region engaged in the exercise (local 🌛 effect, r = 0.67 to 0.

78) and for others regions of the body, as well as, for whole body (remote 🌛 effect, r = 0.53 to 0.

85), when compared to associations evidenced for maximal strength in upper limbs (ie: bench press), 🌛 with local effect only, but not negligible (r = 0.75 to 0.84).4747.

Guimarães BR, Pimenta LD, Massini DA, Santos DD, Siqueira 🌛 LODC, Simionato AR.et al.

Muscular strength and regional lean mass influence bone mineral health among young females.

Rev Bras Med Esporte.2018;24(3):186-91.

In addition, 🌛 the change in leg-press and knee extension muscle strength were associated to changes in femoral BMD (r = 0.37 0.46 🌛 p <0.

01) for people of different ages and both sexes.5252.

Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Hurlbut DE, Martel GF, Lemmer JT, Sorkin 🌛 JD, et al.

Regional bone mineral density after resistive training in young and older men and women.

Scand J Med Sci Sports.2004;14(1):16-23.

Effects 🌛 of resistance training on body composition, muscle strength and bone remodeling

Resistance training has recognized prescriptions able to modulate bone mineralization, 🌛 which is recommend to be perform with high loads, two to three sets per exercise for three times a week 🌛 for 4 to 12 months, with load intensity ranging from 50 to 80% of 1-RM, and engaging upper-limbs (MS) and 🌛 lower-limbs (MI) to achieve an increase of BMD up to 3.

8%, or prevented significant reductions (- 2.

5%), when compared to 🌛 non-exercise persons.1111.

Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, Trice I, Greenberg RA, Evans WJ.

Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk 🌛 factors for osteoporotic fractures: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA.

1994;272(24):1909-14.12.

Bocalini DS, Serra AJ, dos Santos L, Murad N, Levy RF.

Strength training preserves 🌛 the bone mineral density of postmenopausal women without hormone replacement therapy.J Aging Health.2009;21(3):519-27.13.

de Matos O, Lopes da Silva DJ, Martinez 🌛 de Oliveira J, Castelo-Branco C.

Effect of specific exercise training on bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal osteopenia or osteoporosis.Gynecol 🌛 Endocrinol.2009;25(9):616-20.-1414.

Menkes A, Mazel S, Redmond RA, Koffler K, Libanati CR, Gundberg CM, et al.

Strength training increases regional bone mineral density 🌛 and bone remodeling in middle-aged and older men.

J Appl Physiol (1985).1993;74(5):2478-84.,2222.

Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Horan SA, Beck BR.

Heavy 🌛 resistance training is safe and improves bone, function, and stature in postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass: 🌛 novel early findings from the LIFTMOR trial.Osteoporos Int.

2015;26(12):2889-94.,5353.

Zhao R, Zhao M, Xu Z.

The effects of differing resistance training modes on 🌛 the preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.Osteoporos Int.2015;26(5):1605-18.

A classic example of this potential for RT is 🌛 the study of Nickols-Richardson et al.5454.

Nickols-Richardson SM, Miller LE, Wootten DF, Ramp WK, Herbert WG.

Concentric and eccentric isokinetic resistance training 🌛 similarly increases muscular strength, fat-free soft tissue mass, and specific bone mineral measurements in young women.Osteoporos Int.2007;18(6):789-96.

, involving young women 🌛 in unilateral, high-load training program for a period of 5 months, in which improvements in BMD were observed in different 🌛 body regions for both trained and non-trained body segment, highlighting the changes of whole-body BMD (+ 0.4% control and + 🌛 0.

6% trained) and BMD in femur (0.5% control and 1.2% trained).

However, it is not all the studies that show changes 🌛 in BMC and BMD due to resistance exercise.

For Chilibeck et al.5555.

Chilibeck PD, Calder A, Sale DG, Webber CE.

Twenty weeks of 🌛 weight training increases lean tissue mass but not bone mineral mass or density in healthy, active young women.

Can J Physiol 🌛 Pharmacol.1996;74(10):1180-5.

, a 20-week RT for 30-year-old women was sufficient to increase muscle strength (by - 70%), LM (by - 10%), 🌛 but BMC and BMD for whole-body and different body regions have not changed.

Neither in the study by Fujimura et al.5656.

Fujimura 🌛 R, Ashizawa N, Watanabe M, Mukai N, Amagai H, Fukubayashi T, et al.

Effect of resistance exercise training on bone formation 🌛 and resorption in young male subjects assessed by biomarkers of bone metabolism.J Bone Miner Res.1997;12(4):656-62.

were changes found in BMC or 🌛 BMD for whole-body or specific body regions after a 4-month RT program planned with loads between 60-80% 1RM.

On the other 🌛 hand, among premenopausal women (35-45 years), the study of Winter-Stone5757.

Winters-Stone KM, Snow CM.

Site-specific response of bone to exercise in premenopausal 🌛 women.Bone.2006;39(6):1203-9.

investigated an increase in femoral BMD in groups trained for 12 months with: (a) high-impact exercises for lower limbs, and 🌛 (b) high-impact exercises for lower limbs combined with resisted upper limb exercise.

Among postmenopausal women at risk of osteoporosis, there was 🌛 an increase in body and femoral BMD after an 11-month training program involving impact (staircase: 60 to 85% maximal heart 🌛 rate) and contractile tension stimulus (load intensity referring to 8 to 12-RMs)5252.

Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Hurlbut DE, Martel GF, Lemmer 🌛 JT, Sorkin JD, et al.

Regional bone mineral density after resistive training in young and older men and women.

Scand J Med 🌛 Sci Sports.2004;14(1):16-23..

Among middle-aged men (54-61 years), Huuskonen et al.5858.

Huuskonen J, Väisänen SB, Kröger H, Jurvelin JS, Alhava E, Rauramaa R.

Regular 🌛 physical exercise and bone mineral density: a four-year controlled randomized trial in middle-aged men.The DNASCO study.Osteoporos Int.2001;12(5):349-55.

observed an increase in 🌛 femoral BMD in 3.

8%, after 4 months of resistance exercises planned with three weekly sessions and load between 5 and 🌛 15 RM.

The studies highlighted in Boards 1 and 2 provide updated results corroborating the effects of RT on bone remodeling.

Studies 🌛 that showed a greater effect of RT on BMC/BMD reported changes between 6 and 8%2121.

Huovinen V, Ivaska KK, Kiviranta R, 🌛 Bucci M, Lipponen H, Sandboge S, et al.

Bone mineral density is increased after a 16-week resistance training intervention in elderly 🌛 women with decreased muscle strength.

Eur J Endocrinol, 2016;175(6):571-82.,2222.

Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Horan SA, Beck BR.

Heavy resistance training is 🌛 safe and improves bone, function, and stature in postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass: novel early findings 🌛 from the LIFTMOR trial.Osteoporos Int.

2015;26(12):2889-94.,3232.

Almstedt HC, Canepa JA, Ramirez DA, Shoepe TC.

Changes in bone mineral density in response to 24 🌛 weeks of resistance training in college-age men and women.

J Strength Cond Res.

2011;25(4):1098-103..

These studies encompassed a varied population as to age, 🌛 sex and training protocols, using only resistance exercises, but with different loading intensities, with the exception of the Petersen et 🌛 al.2424.

Petersen BA, Hastings B, Gottschall JS.

Low load, high repetition resistance training program increases bone mineral density in untrained adults.

J Sports 🌛 Med Phys Fitness.2017;57(1-2):70-6.

study, which included exercise for cardiovascular endurance on a bicycle.For Petersen et al.2424.

Petersen BA, Hastings B, Gottschall JS.

Low 🌛 load, high repetition resistance training program increases bone mineral density in untrained adults.

J Sports Med Phys Fitness.2017;57(1-2):70-6.

, the use of 🌛 low loads (20% 1-RM) associated to the high number of repetitions showed similar effectiveness to other studies that employed intensity 🌛 between 50-95% 1-RM2121.

Huovinen V, Ivaska KK, Kiviranta R, Bucci M, Lipponen H, Sandboge S, et al.

Bone mineral density is increased 🌛 after a 16-week resistance training intervention in elderly women with decreased muscle strength.

Eur J Endocrinol, 2016;175(6):571-82.,3232.

Almstedt HC, Canepa JA, Ramirez 🌛 DA, Shoepe TC.

Changes in bone mineral density in response to 24 weeks of resistance training in college-age men and women.

J 🌛 Strength Cond Res.

2011;25(4):1098-103..

Additionally, the study of Almstedt et al.3232.

Almstedt HC, Canepa JA, Ramirez DA, Shoepe TC.

Changes in bone mineral density 🌛 in response to 24 weeks of resistance training in college-age men and women.

J Strength Cond Res.

2011;25(4):1098-103.

which analyzed the alterations by 🌛 sex, indicated that among men the effects were more pronounced.

For these authors, this could be explained to the differences in 🌛 hormonal response, initial muscle strength level and food intake in men than women, making the response of BMC/BMD different from 🌛 the stimulus of RT.

Even, it cannot be state that the effects of RT on BMC/BMD would vary according to the 🌛 type of exercises and amount of muscle mass engaged in exercise, since only the study of Huovinen et al.2121.

Huovinen V, 🌛 Ivaska KK, Kiviranta R, Bucci M, Lipponen H, Sandboge S, et al.

Bone mineral density is increased after a 16-week resistance 🌛 training intervention in elderly women with decreased muscle strength.

Eur J Endocrinol, 2016;175(6):571-82.

used multi-joint exercises exclusively.

Meanwhile, the studies of Petersen et 🌛 al.2424.

Petersen BA, Hastings B, Gottschall JS.

Low load, high repetition resistance training program increases bone mineral density in untrained adults.

J Sports 🌛 Med Phys Fitness.2017;57(1-2):70-6.and Almstedt et al.3232.

Almstedt HC, Canepa JA, Ramirez DA, Shoepe TC.

Changes in bone mineral density in response to 🌛 24 weeks of resistance training in college-age men and women.

J Strength Cond Res.

2011;25(4):1098-103.

included only small muscle exercises in the protocol, 🌛 as well as exercises for pelvic region.

Indeed, training programs planned with exercises for the different body parts tend to be 🌛 effectiveness for general conditioning proposes, with no risk to constraints bone remodeling of specific sites such as hip and lumbar 🌛 vertebrae, for those were recommended to approach the specificity from impacting exercises (jumps and variations) and exercises for lower limbs 🌛 (such as squatting and ground lifting).2929.

Mosti MP, Carlsen T, Aas E, Hoff J, Stunes AK, Syversen U.

Maximal strength training improves 🌛 bone mineral density and neuromuscular performance in young adult women.

J Strength Cond Res.

2014;28(10):2935-45.

Another part of studies inserted in Board 1 🌛 and 2 observed positive effects of 1 to 2% in average for the changes of BMC/BMD, as it be from 🌛 isolated RT protocols, or combined with impact or cardiovascular endurance exercises using weight-bearing exercises (running, for example).

In these studies can 🌛 be also highlight the fact that RT applied to the population of different age groups and both sexes obtained a 🌛 similar magnitude of effect on BMC/BMD, no matter the protocol duration (12 to 24 months)3535.

Warren M, Petit MA, Hannan PJ, 🌛 Schmitz KH.

Strength training effects on bone mineral content and density in premenopausal women.

Med Sci Sports Exerc.2008;40(7):1282-8.

, the frequency (2 vs.

3 🌛 weekly sessions), the load (80 vs.40% 1-RM)3131.

Bemben DA, Bemben MG.

Dose–response effect of 40 weeks of resistance training on bone mineral 🌛 density in older adults.Osteoporos Int.2011;22(1):179-86.

, the schedule of training progression to alter overload (linear vs.ondulatory)3434.

Vanni AC, Meyer F, Da Veiga 🌛 AD, Zanardo VP.

Comparison of the effects of two resistance training regimens on muscular and bone responses in premenopausal women.Osteoporos Int.2010;21(9),1537-44.

, 🌛 or even the variation of series (2 vs.3 series)2020.

Cunha PM, Ribeiro AS, Tomeleri CM, Schoenfeld BJ, Silva AM, Souza MF, 🌛 et al.

The effects of resistance training volume on osteosarcopenic obesity in older women.J Sports Sci.

2018;36(14):1564-71.

, and finally by the way 🌛 to perform resistance exercise (circuit vs.traditional)3030.

Romero-Arenas S, Blazevich AJ, Martínez-Pascual M, Pérez-Gómez J, Luque AJ, López-Román FJ, et al.

Effects of 🌛 high-resistance circuit training in an elderly population.Exp Gerontol.2013;48(3):334-40..

It is also noted that the combination of impact exercises with RT for 🌛 a period between 8 and 12 months did not demonstrated to be more effective strategy than the isolated RT to 🌛 change BMC/BMD.For Hinton et al.2727.

Hinton PS, Nigh P, Thyfault J.

Effectiveness of resistance training or jumping-exercise to increase bone mineral density 🌛 in men with low bone mass: A 12-month randomized, clinical trial.Bone.2015;79:203-12.

the changes in whole-body and regional BMD in middle-aged men 🌛 after resistive and impact exercise training were different from baseline, but similar between groups, with the exception of hip BMD 🌛 that altered most with the RT.

However, for Liang et al.3333.

Liang MTC, Braun W, Bassin SL, Dutto D, Pontello A, Wong 🌛 ND, et al.

Effect of high-impact aerobics and strength training on BMD in young women aged 20–35 years.Int J Sports Med.2011;32(02):100-8.

, 🌛 no changes were observed between trained groups (resistance and impact) with control group, involving young adult women.

Perhaps, the absence of 🌛 changes on whole-body and regional BMD in the study of Liang et al.3333.

Liang MTC, Braun W, Bassin SL, Dutto D, 🌛 Pontello A, Wong ND, et al.

Effect of high-impact aerobics and strength training on BMD in young women aged 20–35 years.Int 🌛 J Sports Med.2011;32(02):100-8.

can be explained by the planned volume of jumps, which may interfere with the percentage of BMD changes 🌛 in the hip and femoral trochanter, as observed by Bolam et al.2626.

Bolam KA, Skinner TL, Jenkins DG, Galvão DA, Taaffe 🌛 DR.

The osteogenic effect of impact-loading and resistance exercise on bone mineral density in middle-aged and older men: a pilot study.Gerontology.2015;62(1):22-32.

in 🌛 a population of middle-aged and elderly men.

Even because of the intensity of the load used in the RT, which requires 🌛 loads between 80-85% 1-RM for multi-joint exercises in upper and lower limbs to significantly change the BMD of the lumbar 🌛 vertebrae and femoral neck, according to the study of Watson et al.2222.

Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Horan SA, Beck 🌛 BR.

Heavy resistance training is safe and improves bone, function, and stature in postmenopausal women with low to very low bone 🌛 mass: novel early findings from the LIFTMOR trial.Osteoporos Int.

2015;26(12):2889-94.

In fact, when reviewing the results of BMD from studies including women 🌛 in per- and post-menopausal period (- 50-75 years), planning interventions between 6 and 24 months and used impact exercises alone, 🌛 or in combination to RT (example: 2-3 series, 6-8 repetitions at 70-80% 1-RM, coupled with step exercises or jump on 🌛 boxes) were observed positive increments between 1% and 2% for the lumbar region and femoral neck.5353.

Zhao R, Zhao M, Xu 🌛 Z.

The effects of differing resistance training modes on the preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.Osteoporos Int.2015;26(5):1605-18.,5959.

Sañudo 🌛 B, de Hoyo M, Del Pozo-Cruz J, Carrasco L, Del Pozo-Cruz B, Tejero S, et al.

A systematic review of the 🌛 exercise effect on bone health: the importance of assessing mechanical loading in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.Menopause.

2017;24(10):1208-16.

However, it was emphasized that 🌛 RT (example: 2 sets, 8 repetitions at 80% 1-RM, and 2 weekly sessions) did not present the same effectiveness when 🌛 employed alone, but it was enough to avoid reductions (increase ≤1 % trained group vs.

reductions of up to 2.5% control 🌛 group).5353.

Zhao R, Zhao M, Xu Z.

The effects of differing resistance training modes on the preservation of bone mineral density in 🌛 postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.Osteoporos Int.2015;26(5):1605-18.,5959.

Sañudo B, de Hoyo M, Del Pozo-Cruz J, Carrasco L, Del Pozo-Cruz B, Tejero S, et 🌛 al.

A systematic review of the exercise effect on bone health: the importance of assessing mechanical loading in perimenopausal and postmenopausal 🌛 women.Menopause.

2017;24(10):1208-16.

However, the biological importance of these small changes, or even the unchanged of BMC/BMD values in response to RT can 🌛 be understood by the fact that men and women up to 50 years of age have a BMC/BMD decline rate 🌛 of 0, 3 to 1.

1% per year, which increases considerably among women after 50 years2727.

Hinton PS, Nigh P, Thyfault J.

Effectiveness 🌛 of resistance training or jumping-exercise to increase bone mineral density in men with low bone mass: A 12-month randomized, clinical 🌛 trial.Bone.2015;79:203-12.,3434.

Vanni AC, Meyer F, Da Veiga AD, Zanardo VP.

Comparison of the effects of two resistance training regimens on muscular and 🌛 bone responses in premenopausal women.Osteoporos Int.2010;21(9),1537-44..

Furthermore, the majority of studies highlighted in Tables 1 and 2 show moderate (-10%) to 🌛 high (> 80%) changes of muscle strength in association to the low changes (- 2 to 5%) in lean mass, 🌛 being that sure for groups of elderly people of both sexes77.

Villareal DT, Aguirre L, Gurney AB, Waters DL, Sinacore DR, 🌛 Colombo E, et al.

Aerobic or resistance exercise, or both, in dieting obese older adults.N Engl J Med.

2017;376(20):1943-55.

, just elderly men2525.

Stunes 🌛 AK, Syversen U, Berntsen S, Paulsen G, Stea TH, Hetlelid KJ, et al.

High doses of vitamin C plus E reduce 🌛 strength training-induced improvements in areal bone mineral density in elderly men.Eur J Appl Physiol.

2017;117(6):1073-84.or women2121.

Huovinen V, Ivaska KK, Kiviranta R, 🌛 Bucci M, Lipponen H, Sandboge S, et al.

Bone mineral density is increased after a 16-week resistance training intervention in elderly 🌛 women with decreased muscle strength.

Eur J Endocrinol, 2016;175(6):571-82.,3030.

Romero-Arenas S, Blazevich AJ, Martínez-Pascual M, Pérez-Gómez J, Luque AJ, López-Román FJ, et 🌛 al.

Effects of high-resistance circuit training in an elderly population.Exp Gerontol.2013;48(3):334-40.

, groups of people with different ages and sex2424.

Petersen BA, Hastings 🌛 B, Gottschall JS.

Low load, high repetition resistance training program increases bone mineral density in untrained adults.

J Sports Med Phys Fitness.2017;57(1-2):70-6.

, 🌛 for young adults2929.

Mosti MP, Carlsen T, Aas E, Hoff J, Stunes AK, Syversen U.

Maximal strength training improves bone mineral density 🌛 and neuromuscular performance in young adult women.

J Strength Cond Res.

2014;28(10):2935-45.and children2828.

Cunha GS, Sant'anna MM, Cadore EL, Oliveira NL, Santos CB, 🌛 Pinto RS, et al.

Physiological adaptations to resistance training in prepubertal boys.Res Q Exerc Sport.2015;86(2):172-81..

Such changes, together with cardiovascular conditioning, are 🌛 negatively associated with mortality from different causes, as the risk of falls and fractures among elderly.77.

Villareal DT, Aguirre L, Gurney 🌛 AB, Waters DL, Sinacore DR, Colombo E, et al.

Aerobic or resistance exercise, or both, in dieting obese older adults.N Engl 🌛 J Med.

2017;376(20):1943-55.,1010.

Marques EA, Wanderley F, Machado L, Sousa F, Viana JL, Moreira-Gonçalves D, et al.

Effects of resistance and aerobic exercise 🌛 on physical function, bone mineral density, OPG and RANKL in older women.Exp Gerontol.2011;46(7):524-32.,2323.

Beaver, KM, Beavers DP, Martin SB, Marsh AP, 🌛 Lyles MF, Lenchik L, et al.

Change in bone mineral density during weight loss with resistance versus aerobic exercise training in 🌛 older adults.

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.

2017;72(11):1582-85.,6060.

Guadalupe-Grau A, Fuentes T, Guerra B, Calbet JA.

Exercise and bone mass in adults.Sports 🌛 Med.

2009;39(6):439-68.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, the studies corroborated the integration between the patterns of changes of LM and muscle strength with BMC/BMD modulation.

However, there 🌛 are specific tendencies between men and women regarding bone growth up to adult life, as well as to the reduction 🌛 of muscle and bone mass with aging.

Regarding the mode of exercise to promote such integrated development, studies indicating the RT 🌛 engaging multi-articular motions with high load intensity, as the preponderant stimulus promoting bone remodeling directly, or otherwise indirectly by the 🌛 increase of regional or whole-body lean mass, regardless of age, sex and ethnicity.

The specific guideline for RT approach 70-90% 1RM, 🌛 2-3 sets per exercise, 1-3 minutes interval, 2-3 sessions per week for a period of 4 to 12 months, combining 🌛 with impact exercises (such as a jump, if possible) to improve regional and whole-body BMC/BMD, as well as, for the 🌛 prevention of osteoporosis after the 4th or 5th decades of life.

app aposta copa

números aleatórios (RNG) para garantir que cada rodada seja inteiramente aleatória e

ependente dos resultados anteriores. A vantagem do cassino vem 4️⃣ da "borda da casa"

da, que é uma vantagem matemática que garante um lucro a longo prazo. São máquinas de

nda Rigged? 4️⃣ Por que as slots on-line não estão fixas! pokernews

baseado em bonus de registro casas de apostas

gas, Nevada.... Fremont Hotel e Casino. Vegas- LV. Flamingo Las VEGAS, EUA.. O D

s Hotel, Califórnia. Bellagio Las Vegas., Texas. 💲 A Venetian Resort. La Vegas - Nevada,

stados Unidos. Caesars Palace.

PartyCasino é um casino online legal e licenciado

vel em bonus de registro casas de apostas Nova 💲 Jersey. Se você ganhar, você pode sacar dinheiro real do PartyCasano.