"IBAS" redirects here. For the bishop, see Ibas of Edessa
The Independent Betting
Adjudication Service (IBAS), founded in 1998, is a ⭕️ third party organisation that
settles disputes between gambling establishments registered with IBAS and their
customers in the United Kingdom.[1] The ⭕️ organisation, which was originally part of the
Sporting Life's Green Seal service, was formerly known as the Independent Betting
Arbitration ⭕️ Service.[2] The Service dropped Arbitration from its name in 2007, opting
instead to use Adjudication to better reflect its role ⭕️ after the enactment of the 2005
Gambling Act.[3]
IBAS deals with several sectors in the realm of gambling. The sectors
include:
Dispute ⭕️ involvement [ edit ]
Since its inception, IBAS has been handling the
majority of gambling disputes in the UK.[4] In 2000, ⭕️ the first year that IBAS was fully
operational, approximately 800 disputes went to panel, a number which remained
relatively constant ⭕️ the following year in 2001. In 2002, the number of cases to panel
rose to 1126 due to the abolishment ⭕️ of the UK's gambling tax.[5] Again, IBAS saw
another increase in cases to panel, this time as a result of ⭕️ the 2005 Gambling Act. In
2007, nearly 1700 disputes were handled by the IBAS panel, 372 of which were of ⭕️ the
internet variety. IBAS claims to have awarded customers over £365,000 from dispute
resolutions in 2007.[6] There are also instances ⭕️ when IBAS rules in favour of the
establishment, rather than the customer.[7][8]
IBAS will become involved in a dispute
only after ⭕️ the gambling establishment and the customer(s) have made attempts to resolve
the issue amongst themselves. If a deadlock remains, the ⭕️ dispute will be reviewed by
IBAS if the following conditions are met:
a resolution has not been reached to
satisfaction of ⭕️ either party involved
both parties agree to the terms and conditions of
involving IBAS as a third party adjudicator
If the dispute ⭕️ merits involvement, IBAS
will accept written statements describing the conflict from both parties involved. IBAS
verifies the establishment has upheld ⭕️ their own rules and regulations for gambling. If
no rule that covers the dispute exists, IBAS will set forth its ⭕️ own rule based on what
would be acceptable by industry standards. Both parties are bound by IBAS's
ruling.
Gambling commission [ ⭕️ edit ]
One objective of the UK Gambling Commission is to
ensure that all gamblers are treated fairly in accordance with ⭕️ the rules and
regulations established for the gambling industry. This includes disputes between
customers and gambling operators.[9] By law, any ⭕️ sector in the realm of gambling under
the jurisdiction of the Gambling Commission must use an independent, third party to
⭕️ resolve disputes.[10] Because IBAS is recognised as the third party adjudicator for
nearly all bookmakers in the UK, the Gambling ⭕️ Commission works closely with IBAS to
reduce the number of disputes between customers and gambling operators.[11]
Case
studies [ edit ]
From ⭕️ time to time, IBAS publishes a case study on one of their past
rulings. These case studies provide gamblers with ⭕️ examples of previous disputes to help
prevent future problems between gamblers and operators. The studies focus on aspects of
gambling ⭕️ that are often confusing or misinterpreted. Case studies are available for
several betting options offered to UK gamblers.
One football study ⭕️ published stated
that all football bets are based on 90 minutes, unless otherwise specified by the use
of the words ⭕️ outright, win trophy or another suitable phrase that leaves no doubt as to
the preferred settlement criteria. Bettors need to ⭕️ specify which option they desire
prior to placing the intended wager, otherwise, the bet is assumed to be based on ⭕️ 90
minutes of play.[12]
See also [ edit ]
